Random input. Seems to me you should focus on making Log4J the impl excellent and not trying to create yet.another.facade. ie) Don't compete with SLF4J, compete with Logback (given its licensing).
Hen On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > FWIW, I have been working heavily on Log4J version 2 and would hope you'd > help with that before going to SLF4J [1]. I have separated the API and Impl > in a manner similar to SLF4J/Logback but am working to correct some problems > I've encountered using each of those where I work. > > Ralph > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL/rgoers/ > > > On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :) >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simone Tripodi >> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> I remember I raw a thread - not sure if I did it here at commons orI >>> somewhere else here at apache - where specified we prefer adding >>> [logging] as components dependency instead of slf4j... >>> Did I just get crazy or someone can point me to the right direction please? >>> :) >>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
