On 2011-08-12, sebb wrote: > On 12 August 2011 10:00, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
>> We basically have two options: >> * forking the required classes of "XZ in Java" into Compress (Lasse >> already has a CLA on file and I'm sure we could arrange for the two >> code bases to stay in sync) >> * add a (optional) binary dependency on "XZ in Java". Currently the >> package is not available via a Maven repo, but this can probably be >> arranged as well. >> The first option would allow us to support the format without requiring >> another JAR, the second one may be less work from a maintenance POV. > +1 Which one of the two options does your +1 apply to? I see some advantages in forking the code but lean towards binary dependency + shading. The code is public domain so there is no problem with redistributing it as is. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
