On 11 September 2011 03:55, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > When you say trunk would be replaced by the tag name would that be the tag > that ends with RCx? If so I'd have a problem with that as that tag won't > exist for long.
Yes, as previously discussed at length in this thread. > Ralph > > On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:00 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 10 September 2011 21:04, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't see what the harm is in adding the header line. >>> >>> Before I agree with you I'd want to see what the exact definition would be. >> >> The manifest config in the pom is: >> >> <Implementation-Build>${implementation.build}</Implementation-Build> >> where >> <maven.build.timestamp.format>yyyy-MM-dd >> HH:mm:ssZ</maven.build.timestamp.format> >> <implementation.build>${scmBranch}@r${buildNumber}; >> ${maven.build.timestamp}</implementation.build> >> >> for example in the actual manifest. >> >> Implementation-Build: trunk@r1163241; 2011-09-11 01:55:42+0100 >> >> obviously trunk would be replaced by the tag name. >> >> The format and manifest header name could of course be easily changed, >> or the details could potentially be stored elsewhere in the jar. >> >>> Ralph >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
