+1 for remove the author tag. +0 for the svn header Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity.
Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 15/ott/2011 11.10, "Simone Tripodi" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > I'm in favor of removing @author tags too, developers are enlisted on the > pom. > usually at commons we keep @author tags in existing components, anyway > OGNL is a fresh new codebase so +1 for it :) > All the best, have a nice WE! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Again, the old discussion. > > > > OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I > > prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn > > history. > > > > In addition: > > * $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $ > > > > This line must not be the first of the license header, otherwise > > checkstyle is crying. In addition I have never understood the sense of > > that line. I am +1 for removing it too (svn history does all i need). > > > > If we keep it, we need to move it on class level docs. > > > > OK, let the rumble begin... your opinions gents! > > > > CHeers > > Christian > > > > -- > > http://www.grobmeier.de > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
