Hi Simo,
fields renaming was what I did in order to fix the change styles issue
(otherwise I would have never changed the field name).
I though it seems reasonable looking the other commit messages (see
http://goo.gl/TThpd).


Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara

Maurizio Cucchiara



On 29 October 2011 13:46, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> that's a fields renaming more than checkstyle issues, just to properly
> record changes.
> Anyway I like it, variables prefixed with '_' look so '90 to me :)
> Thanks for taking care!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to