Hi Simo, fields renaming was what I did in order to fix the change styles issue (otherwise I would have never changed the field name). I though it seems reasonable looking the other commit messages (see http://goo.gl/TThpd).
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara On 29 October 2011 13:46, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > that's a fields renaming more than checkstyle issues, just to properly > record changes. > Anyway I like it, variables prefixed with '_' look so '90 to me :) > Thanks for taking care! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org