> > [...]

> > If you don't hear from them, maybe it is because you are the only user
> > (which should probably tell you something of how "broadly" useful the
> > functionality is)...
> > 
> > Personally, I have _zero_ stake in this issue because I don't use
> > "RandomDataImpl"[1].  
> 
> Then please just leave it alone.

This is getting less and less sensible. Do you mean that only people who
actually use a bit of code can have an opinion on whether it could be
improved on?


> Phil
> > I just try to point to a possible improvement of the
> > CM library, for its own sake.
> > 
> > 
> > Gilles
> > 
> > [1] More exactly, I used it indirectly, through the "sample" method of the
> >    "NormalDistributionImpl" (cf. MATH-701).
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to