> [...]
>
> >
> >> could other people add to this list the features they want to have in 3.0 ?
> >
> > I think that more important is the review of opened tickets, asking for
> > people to commit working on them... [Oops, sorry again.]
>
> Yes, this was what I meant. sorry to have used the term "feature"
> inappropriately.
>
>From issues assigned to me:
MATH-707 Should not be too hard (search and replace).
MATH-698 Stuck with CMA-ES; I could use some help (Dietmar?)
MATH-690 Waiting for comments
MATH-664 Waiting for experts to comment/suggest the best solution
MATH-637 Could be resolved
>From issues reported by me:
MATH-413 I think that it could be resolved, but would be happy if someone
can review the "optimization" package...
MATH-438 (Obviously)
MATH-439 One issue not cleared yet I think (related to MATH-413)
MATH-444 (Trivial)
MATH-459 (Will it die?!?)
MATH-488 (ditto)
MATH-622 The default format is a nuisance but annoying to change as many
unit tests start to fail
MATH-666 Should be fairly easy to resolve (unless you are superstitious!)
MATH-689 A few things left to do (partly related to MATH-690)
Best regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
