On 28 November 2011 13:51, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > One might argue that JEXL does not have that many users so jar hell is very > (very) unlikely - no Apache project depends on jexl2 afaik - and that > forcing "up to date/snapshot" users to switch to a new package when they're > already used to recompile against the latest JEXL version is adding burden > on their side (i.e. replace all o.a.c.jexl2 imports with o.a.c.jexl3, update > maven dependencies, etc.) with no practical benefit.
Yes, JEXL is more of an edge case than say NET or Lang or Logging. > However, following the commons best practice being the wisest route to > release, I'll re-attempt an RC after migration to o.a.c.jexl3. > > Regards, > Henrib > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/CANCELLED-VOTE-Release-JEXL-2-1-based-on-RC1-tp4114443p4115226.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
