Some of the release requirements are specific to Commons, not the ASF in
general.
-Adrian
On 12/2/2011 4:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:14 PM, henrib<hen...@apache.org> wrote:
Of course I am frustrated; I'm old enough to know it will pass...
More importantly, I now need to re-evaluate whether JEXL as an Apache
Commons project is a library I can continue to use and recommend for
professional usage; it has a shallow community, only had one committer for
the past 3-4 years and a stringent release police that make extensibility,
bug fix and RFE availability impossible to expect and even less to predict.
It seems that we should focus more on "release early, release often".
I have not pushed a component of mine to Commons because it would take
me for ever to release it - but I need it now. Sometimes releasing at
the asf means endless discussions, and sometimes even ego trips.
I would really appreciate if we as project could get more into some
kind of agile state of development.
Cheers
Christian
Ergo, the simple question I needed to ask. :-)
Cheers,
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/JEXL-Jexl-2-1-tp4147180p4147799.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org