On 8 December 2011 07:11, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Gary Gregory wrote: > >> I am thinking of a different package name, not just version for VFS on >> Java 7 because we might want to release more VFS2-based versions that do >> break binary compatibility. >> >> We can retain the VFS name and brand for the project, but I'd prefer >> o.a.c.vfs<n> to be for VFS2 based work and to create o.a.c.filesystem (or >> fs) for Java 7 FileSystem-based work. >> >> Thoughts? > > Until now we had the policy to add the major number to the package name i.e. > this is org.apache.commons.vfs3 here.
As I already mentioned earlier in this thread, that may clash with updates to VFS 2.x that need a new package name. > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
