Hello. (1) To further rationalize the class naming in package "optimization", I propose the following changes: * "RealPointValuePair" -> "PointScalarValuePair" * "VectorialPointValuePair" -> "PointVectorValuePair"
(2) I wonder whether we could use the "Pair" class (in "util") as a base class for all the "pair" classes defined in "optimization". (3) It would be clearer to have, for each of the above types, a single implementation of a "Simple...Checker", to replace the two that currently exist. Which of "point" or "value" is to be checked could be selected using an "enum" specified at construction. What do you think? Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
