On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well. > > Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI. > > Commons Image > Commons Imaging > Commons JIL > > But I'm not sure that's any better than Imaging.
Let's not forget the obvious: imageio. That fits in the Java 5 and commons naming nicely. Java 5 provides javax.imageio, which we should take advantage of if possible. Gary > > On 21 December 2011 03:04, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 for commons-imaging >> On Dec 19, 2011 12:26 PM, "Matt Benson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> +1 for renaming >>>> >>>> What's the best choice, Commons Images or Commons Image ? I tend to >>> prefer >>>> the plural form. >>> >>> Having introduce alternatives, [imaging] strikes me as even more >>> appropriate. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>>> >>>> Emmanuel Bourg >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 19/12/2011 15:54, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>>> >>>>> This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image. >>>>> >>>>> The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net], >>>>> and so on. >>>>> >>>>> This VOTE is open until December 22, 10AM EST. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
