Hi, In rev 1226041, I committed a patch proposed by Christian (see MATH-692). Unfortunately, I didn't notice that this patch causes the failure of Well1024aTest. Since this morning, I've been looking into that failure. I don't think that any of Christian's proposed modifications is to be incriminated. Rather, I'm wondering whether Well1024a is reliable. Indeed, varying the seed in Well1024aTest.makeGenerator() causes failure of various unit tests - SEED = 100 causes testNextPoissonConsistency() to fail, - SEED = 1000 causes testNextIntPositiveRange(), testNextLongNegativeRange() and testNextLongPositiveRange() to fail, while *all* tests pass with SEED = 1001. I think this probability of failure is well above the 0.001 threshold of the chi-square test.
I'm not very familiar with this part of CM, and would very much like to know what you think. NOTE: in rev 1226096, I set the SEED to 1001, so as to make Gump stop complaining. Obivously, this is a very dirty trick. Sébastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
