On 02/06/2012 09:10 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 17:45, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
Hmm, right. I'll revert the patch. There should be no surprises
or new features with 1.0.x branch.
Think that --foo=a ++foo=b ++foo=c should behave like
If there was foo set, set to a b c, not add a b c.
Agreed; new patch (r1241101) looks good.
I'll tag and prepare 1.0.9 RC later today.
Seems we covered all that's important.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
