On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:02:36AM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 09/02/2012 10:50, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > > Hi Luc, > >> > >> I agree with you, enums are much better. There are other places in > >> [math] where we use boolean or even ints for such things. They mainly > >> came for pre-java 5 era when enums where not available. > >> > >> Luc > >> > > And what do you think of replacing > > - transform(double[]) with transform(double[], FORWARD) > > - inverseTransform(double[]) with transform(double[], INVERSE) > > (also using enums) ? > > It's good too.
+1 Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
