On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:47 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 March 2012 17:14, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > If there is anything you're itching to for for codec 1.7, now is the > time. > > Any comments on CODEC-96 ? > Base64 encode() method is no longer thread-safe, breaking clients > using it as a shared BinaryEncoder > > The patch restores thread-safety, but Clirr reports binary compat issues. > I think these are unlikely to be an actual problem, but this should be > reviewed. >
If someone wants to work on that, be my guest. We've been strict about BC so I this might have to wait for 2.0 though. Unless we can show that breaking BC should not affect normal users. > > Also CODEC-137 (website javadoc link) needs fixing. > I think this is already taken care of in trunk where the link is for Codec 1.7. Gary > > > I plan on doing an RC this week. > > > > Gary > > > > -- > > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
