On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrot >> However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump. > > if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a > compatibility break? My argument is it is no longer compatible with > jdk5.
Agreed. However, I think we can leave this discussion until the point before the actual release when we have a better overview of what has actually changed. As I see it, this is a chance where we *can* do incompatible changes. (That can be valuable, ever so often.) Jochen -- "Bildung kommt von Bildschirm und nicht von Buch, sonst hieße es ja Buchung." Dieter Hildebrandt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
