Le 07/05/2012 22:16, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > Hi. Hi Gilles,
> > There is another complaint about some class not being "Serializable": > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-787 > > I don't want to argue all over again. > > We should probably add a section in the user guide stating the policy with > regards to this issue. > The problem is that I don't know what the policy is. > > Either we agree that supporting Serializable is none of our business (my > viewpoint), and I can add that section; or we continue to be sloppy on this > issue and just blindly write "implements Serializable" whenever we get such > a complaint (stating in the Javadoc that the serializable form is not to be > relied on, in the sense that any two versions of CM can produce forms that > are not compatible). I am in favor of this second option: add Serializable were needed upon request. In this case, the request seems fair as the class is mainly a simple container for two values. What do other people think ? Luc > > > > Thanks, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
