I would rather we eat our own dog food with log4j or commons logging. Gary
On Jun 3, 2012, at 11:42, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Well, you might want the logging to be silent during normal testing but to be > enabled if problems arise. > > Ralph > > On Jun 3, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > >> Can anyone provide a reason [classscan] should not simply use >> slf4j-simple in the test scope rather than logback? It's a small >> change, but any reduction in complexity... >> >> Matt >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
