Agreed. I'm in OSGi-land these days (ServiceMix, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc.), so I'm all for it! :)
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: > No objections here. > If there is a spec we can follow, we should do it. > In commons we build components - osgi is very natural for these kind > of stuff. If it helps the OSGi people and we have only little effort - > why not? > > Cheers > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Opening <CanOfWorms>... > > > > Should Commons adopt OSGi Semantic Versioning [1] instead of defining our > > own [2] (even though they might in effect be the same)? > > > > Should Commons layer its semantic version details on top of OSGi? > > > > [1] http://www.osgi.org/wiki/uploads/Links/SemanticVersioning.pdf > > [2] http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html > > > > Gary > > -- > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
