great +1 on that - when working towards the first [functor] release, I was worried that if our intention is including [functor] in BVal, I would have brought a lot of unused stuff.
count on my support! best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an > api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without > bringing along everything. Does anyone have any feelings on further > subdivisions within the [functor] codebase that might be useful? > > Matt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
