On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 03:01:49PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 8/4/12 11:57 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > > > It seems that the patch for MATH-610 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-610 > > is fairly innocuous. > > > > Does anyone object to it being applied? > > > > > > Gilles > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > No strong objections, but I see it as needless code bloat > personally. Also, without changing visibility (which I am -1 on) > for the inner class, I don't see an easy way to add tests for the > proposed new code.
Then I would rephrase: Has anyone an objection to resolving MATH-610 as "Won't fix"? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
