Hi, 2012/8/13 Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>: > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/org/ofbiz/base/util/cache/package-summary.html >
thanks for the input! As far as I understand the LRUMap seems to be more appropriate than a map using some sort of reference. But I'll have a look anyway! The LRUMap from commons is not thread safe so we will have to deal with that. Benedikt > -Adrian > > > On 8/13/2012 2:51 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >> Hi Adrian, >> >> any direct link? TIA! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Adrian Crum >> <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote: >>> >>> Apache OFBiz has a soft reference cache implementation. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> >>> On 8/13/2012 1:07 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>> >>>> guten morgen Bene, >>>> >>>> I have not a strong opinion about it, I am convinced anyway that the >>>> original BU authors (BU2 at the beginning was a tentative to refurbish >>>> BU) adopted the WeakHashMap NOT with the purpose of implementing a >>>> `cache` in the strict sense we are used to. We should go back to the >>>> ML history and find related discussions about it to understand that >>>> decision. >>>> >>>> If we need to switch implementation, in Apache Cocoon we developed a >>>> simple LRU cache hacking the LinkedHashMap, we could import and adapt >>>> that version - it would be better keeping BU2 dependencies-less. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Simo >>>> >>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/9zN >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Benedikt Ritter <benerit...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I just came across this post: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.codeinstructions.com/2008/09/weakhashmap-is-not-cache-understanding.html >>>>> Now i'm wondering what you think about it, since we are using the >>>>> WeakHashMap for BU2. Maybe we should be looking for an alternative >>>>> caching mechanism? >>>>> Any suggestions? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Benedikt >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
