Hi, in MATH-849, I have proposed an implementation of Gamma(x) (previously, class Gamma had only logGamma(x)). Gamma(x) is not defined for x negative integer. In such instances, I would like to throw an exception instead of returning Double.NaN. However, creating a new exception in o.a.c.m.exception seems exagerated, since it's very unlikely that this exception should be used elsewhere (or maybe). Should I define a nested exception instead [1]?
What do you think of the name "UnexpectedNegativeIntegerException"? It does not really match the pattern of already defined exceptions, but I can't find a better name. Thanks, Sébastien [1] I don't think nested exceptions is the way to go, as the localizable message should have to be defined in o.a.c.m.exception.util.LocalizedFormats. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
