I do not think skipping should be done at the parent level. If [math] wants to skip it, it can.
Gary On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Gilles Sadowski < gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > Hello. > > The situation with "Cobertura" is fairly annoying, perhaps particularly so > for Commons Math because of the size of the code base (and thus the fairly > large number of unit tests). > > As it just happened, a few minor problems have now delayed the release by > several days because I have to wait about 4 hours for the site generation > to complete (on a _fast_ machine). > Hence the request to remove Cobertura from the "site" target, or at least > from the "site:stage-deploy" step, so that a new vote can take place as > soon > as a problem is fixed. > [I would even argue that it is not that useful to include Cobertura in the > release process because the amount of code coverage is not acted upon (i.e. > low coverage would not block a release IIUC).] > > Do you agree? > If so, can we change that for Commons Math only, or should this be done at > the "parent" level? Is is just a matter of adding > <cobertura.skip>true</cobertura.skip> > in a new profile? > > > Regards, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
