On 02/19/2013 03:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> @TN: So... what is the performance difference as a %? The size of the input
> must matter too...

I updated the issue with the latest performance data.

It is now still slower compared to the other two implementations (on
encode), but almost on par. Further improvements could be made in the
way we increase / ensure the buffer size.

Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to