There seems to be nothing unusual contained in [1], so I don't know that anything further is necessary in [fileupload]'s NOTICE file.
$0.02, Matt [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec/NOTICE?view=markup On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote: > Hi Matt!!! > > do you have any template sentence to put in the NOTICE, to suggest me? > > TIA! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You might check the NOTICE file in the project whence they came. > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Simone Tripodi > > <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote: > > > >> Salut Luc/all, > >> > >> I replaced javax.mail classes with the ones provided by our friends of > >> Apache Geronimo, see r1456515. > >> I retailed the original classes in order to drop unneeded stuff and > >> have a pure MIME decoder. > >> > >> Do you have any feedback? What is the legal procedure to mention that > >> those classes have been stripped from Geronimo? > >> > >> Many thanks in advance! > >> -Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> > >> wrote: > >> > Le 13/03/2013 16:46, Simone Tripodi a écrit : > >> >> Hi again Luc/all, > >> >> > >> >> I just realised that our fellows of Apache Geronimo ship an ALv2.0 > >> >> version of javax.mail[1] - there should be any kind of issue on > >> >> importing and adapting their source code, right? > >> > > >> > Sure. It's much better this way. > >> > > >> > Luc > >> > > >> >> > >> >> TIA! > >> >> -Simo > >> >> > >> >> [1] > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.4/src/main/java/javax/mail/internet/MimeUtility.java > >> >> > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> >> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:13 PM, luc <l...@spaceroots.org> wrote: > >> >>> Le 2013-03-12 11:15, Simone Tripodi a écrit : > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hi all guys, > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi Simone, > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> due to FILEUPLOAD-199, I shaded 2 classes from javax.mail package > to > >> >>>> support RFC2047 header values, I kindly ask you a couple of > feedbacks > >> >>>> about: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> * verify the shaded jar works in an integration test, if some of > you > >> >>>> has an application where experimenting the current SNAPSHOT; > >> >>>> > >> >>>> * review the legals: I updated the LICENSE file in order to > clarify > >> >>>> that commons-fileupload ships the javax.mail external classes; > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> This should not be done in the LICENSE file but in the NOTICE file. > >> >>> > >> >>> Nevertheless, I don't think we can do that at all in this case. The > >> classes > >> >>> are subject to either GPL or CDDL license. We *cannot* ship anything > >> >>> subject ot GPL license. so this would imply we should consider we > got > >> it > >> >>> under > >> >>> the terms of CDDL license. Looking at > >> >>> <http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#criteriaandcategories>, > >> >>> we must "appropriately label" these parts, and they must be "For > small > >> >>> amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at > >> runtime in > >> >>> source form, and for which that source is unlikely to be changed > anyway > >> >>> (say, by virtue of being specified by a standard), this action is > >> >>> sufficient." Here, the code has been modified, so I'm not sure we > >> fulfill > >> >>> the requirements. > >> >>> > >> >>> You should ask legal@, and during the time we wait for their > advice, > >> you > >> >>> should *remove* this code from > >> >>> our repository. > >> >>> > >> >>> best regards, > >> >>> Luc > >> >>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Please note that, when shading, I relocated the javax.mail classes > >> >>>> under o.a.c.fileupload.utils.javax.mail package in order to avoid > >> >>>> potential collisions in the classpath with javax.mail.* classes > >> >>>> provided by the container where fileupload is deployed. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best! > >> >>>> -Simo > >> >>>> > >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > >> >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> >
