Thank you for working on this.
The original proposal was to replace Cobertura with something else. I
asked that the sub projects have an option to use whatever reporting
tool they want. So, it would be fine if some other reporting tool was
the default as long as sub projects can use something else.
-Adrian
On 4/4/2013 9:03 PM, sebb wrote:
CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting".
The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using
-DskipReports=true
or
-P!reporting
IIRC, the idea was to move expensive (long-running) reports to a profile
that could be disabled if necessary.
However Cobertura causes problems with some projects, and the project seems
to be unmaintained, so perhaps it would be sensible to disable Cobertura by
default.
In which case the profile and property should be renamed to reflect the
fact that it only affects Cobertura.
Possibly even drop Cobertura entirely from the parent POM.
However, I think it is important that some code coverage tool is used.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
