On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Mirko Raner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, it would have been nice if the combined encoder/decoder interface
> from CODEC-158 could make it into the release, but it seems like we're
> stalled on that issue right now.
> I'm happy to discuss this feature for the next release. I'm curious to find
> out how generics could be used for providing access to an encoder and
> corresponding decoder as a single object.
>

Take a look at the generics branch in SVN from one way generics could be
used.

Gary

>
> Mirko
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I'd like to push 1.8 out to pick up the few changes we have as it seems
> we
> > are stable.
> >
> > After that we can talk about more interesting changes, interfaces,
> generics
> > and so on.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
> > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
>



-- 
E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to