My view is that we do not have to fix or address everything in each release that is outstanding. In my mind its important to keep the release trains moving.
Gary On Apr 21, 2013, at 0:45, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Because they're low hanging fruit: > > Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299 > Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328 > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295 > > Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :) > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All: >>> >>> I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts? >>> >> >> I think the following need resolving: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356 >> >> Possibly some others >> >> >> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition< >>> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
