Hi All: [parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning from the folks over at [math] being that Jacoco is very fast compared to Cobertura. In the case of [math] it's hours vs. minutes.
The problem is that Jacoco produces bogus results as I recently emailed about the [io] component. The large portion of the code is reported with 0% coverage which is completely wrong. This is apparently a known issue due to the Jacoco use of 'probes' to analyze code which is not compatible with the use of exceptions. If you get the latest from [io] and edit the POM to enable JaCoC, you can compare both reports in the generated site with 'mvn clean site'. Fast and bogus is not better than slow and right. I propose we switch [parent] back to Cobertura until a better alternative is proposed. [math] can decide if it can live with the fast and bad results provided by Jacoco. Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
