On 2013-05-29, sebb wrote: > On 29 May 2013 05:13, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 2013-05-28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:08 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 25 May 2013 18:47, <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> import java.util.Deque; >>>> That requires Java 1.6; Compress currently targets 1.5 >>> Well, let's change the requirement to Java 6 for Compress 1.6. >> Not necessary in this case IMHO. The Deque is never exposed to the user >> so I can change it to LinkedList (the Deque implementation actually >> used) without feeling bad. >> I'll take care of it. > I already did so, but I used a List. Yes, saw that. LinkedList#getFirst may be slightly faster than #get(0) and I expect getEntry() to be involked more often that getEntries() so it may be useful to explicitly use LinkedList. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
