There are also a couple of Apache OpenOffice guys really interested on maintaining it, since they use BeanShell as dependency.
best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:30 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > I am certainly intending to do work on BeanShell. > > The author(s) have contributed to the various Incubator discussions. > > On 29 May 2013 11:59, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, but who will maintain it? What does the author think of this? >> >> Gary >> >> On May 29, 2013, at 4:35, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Being a happy user of BeanShell (in the jEdit world) and being a sleepy >>> Apache Commons committer. I'm all in favor of seeing beanshell come in here. >>> >>> paul >>> >>> On 28 mai 2013, at 09:34, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all PMC members, >>>> >>>> I started a VOTE thread in general@incubator to accept BeanShell in >>>> the incubating projects, Bertrand Delacretaz and Ant Elder made >>>> interesting observations (pasted below) about accepting BeanShell >>>> directly to Commons. >>>> >>>> I think we are in the similar past situations when we voted new >>>> committers and accepted their donations to the Commons Sandbox - WDYT? >>>> Would it be reasonable for that PMC accepting BS in Sandbox and accept >>>> a couple of new committers? >>>> >>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best! >>>> -Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> ...Half the committers are ASF >>>>> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach >>>>> Sebb anything new about doing releases... >>>> >>>> Indeed ;-) >>>> >>>>> ...All thats needed is a software grant and IP clearance (which from the >>>>> previous discuss thread has already been done?) and start up right away in >>>>> Commons... >>>> >>>> Makes sense, I agree with you that the Incubator doesn't bring any >>>> more value in this case...has the commons PMC been asked about this >>>> option? >>>> >>>> I'm changing my vote to -1, at least until this is clarified. >>>> >>>> -Bertrand >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
