There are also a couple of Apache OpenOffice guys really interested on
maintaining it, since they use BeanShell as dependency.

best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:30 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am certainly intending to do work on BeanShell.
>
> The author(s) have contributed to the various Incubator discussions.
>
> On 29 May 2013 11:59, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sure, but who will maintain it? What does the author think of this?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On May 29, 2013, at 4:35, Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Being a happy user of BeanShell (in the jEdit world) and being a sleepy 
>>> Apache Commons committer. I'm all in favor of seeing beanshell come in here.
>>>
>>> paul
>>>
>>> On 28 mai 2013, at 09:34, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all PMC members,
>>>>
>>>> I started a VOTE thread in general@incubator to accept BeanShell in
>>>> the incubating projects, Bertrand Delacretaz and Ant Elder made
>>>> interesting observations (pasted below) about accepting BeanShell
>>>> directly to Commons.
>>>>
>>>> I think we are in the similar past situations when we voted new
>>>> committers and accepted their donations to the Commons Sandbox - WDYT?
>>>> Would it be reasonable for that PMC accepting BS in Sandbox and accept
>>>> a couple of new committers?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>>> -Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
>>>> Date: Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator
>>>> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> ...Half the committers are ASF
>>>>> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach
>>>>> Sebb anything new about doing releases...
>>>>
>>>> Indeed ;-)
>>>>
>>>>> ...All thats needed is a software grant and IP clearance (which from the
>>>>> previous discuss thread has already been done?) and start up right away in
>>>>> Commons...
>>>>
>>>> Makes sense, I agree with you that the Incubator doesn't bring any
>>>> more value in this case...has the commons PMC been asked about this
>>>> option?
>>>>
>>>> I'm changing my vote to -1, at least until this is clarified.
>>>>
>>>> -Bertrand
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to