CompliantBag is just terrible, I'm sorry. If we want to follow [DecoratorType][CollectionType] then CollectionBag?
Gary On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidh...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 07/01/2013 09:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > I find the class name CompliantBag pretty confusing. Compliant with what? > > The Javadoc says Collection so, why not call it BagCollection? > > I agree that CompliantBag is not a very good choice, but the notation in > collections was to name decorators like this: > > [DecoratorType][CollectionType] -> e.g. TransformedBag > > CollectionCompliantBag also does not sound like a good name to me, but > neither does BagCollection. > > Thomas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
