Yep, thanks. ;-)
On Jul 27, 2013 1:36 PM, "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> I do not plan on making us lose anything.  What I am looking for is to
> build layers of abstraction.  The stuff you have developed right now I
> would probably point at the lower-level abstractions that I'm writing
> currently.  Does that make sense?
>
> On Saturday, July 27, 2013, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> As I had mentioned, support for some form of dynamic response was the last
>> feature I had wanted to get into the stub module, so I am certainly not
>> opposed to this. I had simply thought to eat dog food by using [functor]
>> interfaces, but that's not a big deal. I have not yet reviewed your latest
>> work, but I really don't want to lose the fluent and typesafe API that
>> exists currently.
>>
>> Matt
>> On Jul 27, 2013 11:17 AM, "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have created
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-20
>> >
>> > to track the progress of this issue.  I have already checked in some
>> > code into the branch.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:54 AM, James Carman
>> > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>> > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi
>> > >>
>> > >> Isnt it a particular kind of interceptor/handler
>> > (CompositeInterceptor)? So
>> > >> does it need so much details?
>> > >
>> > > Well, the idea behind "stubbing" is that we would be specifying
>> > > behavior for very specific method invocation cases (such as only a
>> > > single method or only when the parameters match certain values).  If
>> > > we introduce the abstractions I'm suggesting, we can handle these
>> > > cases and many more.  I don't know if we need the Response concept,
>> > > since the interface exactly matches the Interceptor interface.
>> > > Perhaps we call the new class ConditionalInterceptor and you register
>> > > InvocationMatcher/Interceptor pairs just so we don't have to re-invent
>> > > the wheel.
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to