I'm not saying that we cannot promote it. I'm just saying that we should only promote it if it is ready to be released.
2013/8/13 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > Hi > > I think the point with weaver is more that some other apache projects (bval > for instance) needs it for next release. > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/8/13 Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > > > Hi, > > > > I haven't been working on weaver so I cannot really comment on it's > state. > > IMHO it's important that we only promote components to proper that are > very > > close to a release. > > > > We have several components in proper that I think have been promoted to > > early. > > Examples are: csv, functor, imaging. > > After the first enthusiasm has ceased they are hanging around in proper > > without being released. > > > > I haven't seen much activity in weaver over the past weeks. How close is > it > > to a release? What has to be done to cut an RC? > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > 2013/8/11 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > > > > > Hi all, > > > Hopefully you've noticed that I've been working, as time permits, on > > the > > > [weaver] component in the sandbox. As a reminder, this component > (after > > an > > > exhausting bout of on-list consensus building ;) ), is designed as a > > > general-purpose framework for defining bytecode transformations that > may > > be > > > applied to a given codebase. Currently a local filesystem-based > > > implementation is available which backs both a Maven plugin as well as > a > > > custom Ant library, or "antlib". There are two weaver implementations > > > available as of now: > > > > > > * privilizer, which automates the handling of Java SecurityManager > > > privileges > > > * normalizer, which merges functionally identical anonymous class > > > definitions > > > > > > I feel that this component is now ready to be promoted to proper and > > > released. Does anyone have any concerns they feel should be addressed? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > http://github.com/britter > > > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
