That sounds good to me too. The less duplication, the better. Gary
On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:16, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say we should extract the conversion stuff out of [beanutils] > and create [convert] (with some modifications to the API perhaps) an > have [beanutils] use the new component. > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: >> Two weeks ago, I mentioned that BeanUtils and Convert heavily overlap. Some >> others agreed. Do we want to fold one project into the other? Or can we >> find justification to have 2 separate conversion projects? >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
