I have partial interest in daemon and net because I use these at work or other project.
Gary -------- Original message -------- From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> Date:11/29/2013 05:36 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: Re: [CHALLENGE] Move All of Commons to the Dormant 2013/10/15 Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> > I contend that all of the Commons components are inactive and should move > to the Attic/Dormant. In line with Phil's recent suggestion that anyone can > present a dormancy challenge at any time, I'm challenging all of Commons > Proper. > > I've made a file in SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper/CHALLENGE.txt > > If committers could put their ids next to components they actively monitor > the commits, JIRA, mailing list for, then we can determine, by elimination, > the components that should be considered for dormancy. > > I propose we review the state of the file at the start of November :) > > Hen > Well, it's end of November now. So it's time to review the result of this challenge... Components with no active or interested maintainers: - attributes - betwixt - bsf - dbutils - digester - discovery - el - exec - jci - launcher - modeler - validator Components with only one or only partially interested maintainer(s) bcel=markt[partial],sebb[partial] chain=britter cli=ebourg daemon=sebb[partial] email=tn fileupload=markt[partial] jcs=tv logging=rwhitcomb*,[tn] net=sebb,[tn] ognl=grobmeier primitives=[tn] proxy=mbenson weaver=mbenson Comments? thoughts? Benedikt -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
