On 12/07/2013 06:55 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commons BeanUtils 1.9.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/ (svn
> revision 3852)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-021/commons-beanutils/commons-beanutils/1.9.0/
>
> Details of changes since 1.8.3 are in the release notes:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> The tag is here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/beanutils/tags/BEANUTILS_1_9_0_RC1/
> (svn revision 1548928)
>
> Site:
>
>
> KEYS:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1800
> GMT 10-December 2013
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
I tested the tag and got the following test error:
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 27.331
sec <<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.commons.beanutils.memoryleaktests.MemoryLeakTestCase
testMethodUtils_cache_memoryLeak(org.apache.commons.beanutils.memoryleaktests.MemoryLeakTestCase)
Time elapsed: 15.489 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Your JVM is not releasing
SoftReference, try running the testcase with less memory (-Xmx)
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.memoryleaktests.MemoryLeakTestCase.forceGarbageCollection(MemoryLeakTestCase.java:496)
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.memoryleaktests.MemoryLeakTestCase.testMethodUtils_cache_memoryLeak(MemoryLeakTestCase.java:282)
This does not look like a blocker though.
Environment:
Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
17:22:22+0200)
Maven home: /home/tn/bin/apache-maven-3.1.1
Java version: 1.7.0_25, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "3.2.0-56-generic-pae", arch: "i386", family:
"unix"
According to the issue tracker there are currently 3 blocker and 6
critical issues which are targeted for 2.0. After looking at them, I
would suggest to better target for a 1.9.1 release specifically
resolving these issues, as I understand that the main purpose of 1.9 is
to introduce generics.
The rest looks fine, the release notes are very clear! (and look better
than the ones I have generated so far ;-)
+1
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
