On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@swisspost.com > wrote:
> Hi Adrian, > > Adrian Crum wrote: > > > That would only work if the CSV file had column names. > > No, it works only if it has *unique* column names. Guess, this is normally > the case, but there's no such requirement. > If your column names are not unique, what good are they? This reminds me of the discussion of whether we should have two classes: a positional record (int access) and a mapped record (String access) or just the one we currently have (combo). We already provide String access which is a subset of Map access. So the question is, why is wrong to extend the String access we have now to Map access? Gary > > > Maybe make a > > class that implements Map and contains a CSVRecord - so it's optional. > > Cheers, > Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
