On 2/8/14, 9:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we are very close to releasing 3.3.
> Looking through the issues, the following should/need to be resolved:
>
> TN (in progress):
>
>  * [MATH-1071] Improve genetic algorithms section in userguide
>  * [MATH-1061] Improve filter section in userguide
>  * [MATH-749] Convex Hull algorithm: almost finished
>
> Others:
>
>  * [MATH-1065] EnumeratedRealDistribution.inverseCumulativeProbability
>
>    should be fixed imho, I outlined an algorithm but would like to have
>    some feedback

See comment on ticket.
>
>  * [MATH-923] Kohonen's SOFM: can it be considered finished?

You mean releasable :)

+1 - I like this code.  The question is really are we OK with the
API and I don't think we will be able to definitively answer that
until we get it out and used, so I would say release it now,
assuming Gilles and others agree.
>  * [MATH-928] Alternative approach to matrix implementations:
>
>    postpone to 4.0?
+1
>
>  * [MATH-990] Improve performance of MathArrays.sortInPlace:
>
>    finished for 3.3?

+1
>
>
> Other issues to be discussed:
>
>  * [MATH-1008]
>
>    a new package has been created o.a.c.m.fitting.leastsquares which
>    contains some interface for the new fluent API but they are also
>    used elsewhere so I guess it would be more logical to put them in a
>    more general place, e.g. WithMaxEvaluations should be moved to
>    o.a.c.m.optim. WDYT?

+1
>
>  * Clirr errors in o.a.c.m.geometry and sub-packages
>    there are now ~30 errors wrt changed interfaces due to some
>    refactoring. What shall we do about them?

Need to decide which are really problems and either revert or doc
them somehow.

I have two other things I would like to get in, but will not hold
the release up for:

Fix for MATH-984 and first part of MATH-437 (new class and
deprecations).  I have the second thing pretty much done modulo some
doco cleanup and MATH-984 is straightforward.  I am a little pegged
atm so may miss the boat; but will try to crank through these and
review other stuff.  The new KS class and deprecation I would really
like to get in because I would like us to remove the existing KS
class in 4.0.

Phil
>
> Thomas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to