Le 17/02/2014 16:15, Ted Dunning a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Emmanuel Joliet > <ejol...@sciops.esa.int>wrote: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-870 >> >> " Recently, many problems have been found out with class ..." >> Please, consider not removing it. >> We use it heavily and need the class as it gives what we need (handling >> the input of course is necessary regarding NaN and infinities!). >> I understand the problem of an incorrect/improper handling of NaN/Infinity >> conditions but can't justify to remove the iterfaces/classes completely? >> Isn't it??
For now, the classes are still there and will remain at least as long as we release versions in the 3.x series. The next version will be 3.3, so the classes will still be there. > > > Yeah... welcome to commons math. > > It does seem like an extreme sanction to me. I agree. I think we get over zealous here regarding NaNs, as it seems all other libraries simply ignore this, and it seems to be a widely accepted way. best regards, Luc > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
