On 18/02/2014 16:35, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 18/02/2014 05:26, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Problem with the site: on the main page under "Migrating from Pool 2.0", >>> the current version described is 2.1, not 2.2. >>> >>> I would rename this section "Migrating to Pool 2.1 from 2.0" and add a >> new >>> section "Migrating to Pool 2.2 from 2.1". The "Migrating from Pool 1.x" >>> section should then be renamed "Migrating to Pool 2.0 from 1.x". This >> will >>> give migrations a clearer set of docs IMO. >> >> Yes, that needs some work. I'll take a look. >> >> I'd prefer it if this page didn't need to be updated with every release >> as that adds to the work required for each release as well as adding >> another place where something can be overlooked requiring a new RC. >> > > The page only has to be updated if the user has to migrate anything. If a > release is 100% source and binary compatible, you do not have to say > anything.
The way the page was structured it needed to be updated for every release. I agree it should only need changing if there are migration issues to mention (which there shouldn't be). The new wording should address that. > IMO, it would be better to say something, but that's just me, > hopefully the site has a like to the RN file so I can look there. It has a link to the changes file but not the release notes. The site building process doesn't appear to copy the release notes else I could just add a link. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
