Hi Oliver!
> > I am not sure about this, also because of the energy required to make > the port happen. Wouldn't it be better to put this energy directly into > BU2? > > for "porting" I just meant enabling the fluent interfaces, ina separated package, which implementations just rely on existing BU core engine, i.e. a they just collect parameters and invoke methods using BU. Benefits I see are: * an easier/faster way to give our users new APIs and let them used to; * making easier the update to BU2, when/if it will be released. > BU has many flaws and keeping it alive artificially is maybe not the > best option. Oliver > > Alles Gute! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
