On 27 March 2014 15:47, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sebb, maybe I missed the context of the proposal. If the @since 1.0 is on
> the class, there's no need for it to be on methods unless the methods are
> of another version. I think that's the standard javadoc way from Oracle
> anyway.

Yes.

But the only way to identify subsequent additional methods on a class
is to add an @since marker to them.

What about all the other methods in the class?
Do they then all have to have @since 1.0 added?

Otherwise how can one tell if a missing @since marker on a method is
deliberately omiited (because it's the same as the class) or
accidentally omitted?

That's not to say that @since markers aren't useful.
But I don't buy the argument that the starting classes need to be tagged.

>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> The point about not knowing where a missing annotation means it was
>> forgotten or whether it means ab initio may perhaps work with classes.
>>
>> However once a class has an @since marker, there's no way of telling
>> whether its method and field @since markers are deliberately or
>> accidentally omitted.
>>
>> The only way to deal with that would be to insist on @since markers
>> for every class, method and field.
>>
>>
>> On 27 March 2014 15:27, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1. Due to the package change and fundamental shift from ProxyFactory
>> > as abstract class to interface, arguably everything (or very nearly
>> > so) is @since 2.0 anyway.
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:22 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Whilst removing the @author tags I noticed that there are 39 @since
>> >> markers, all are @since 1.0.
>> >>
>> >> I think we should remove these.
>> >>
>> >> If not, then we need to add @since markers to identify what has been
>> >> added since.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to