2014-03-28 14:50 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>:

> On 28 March 2014 09:34, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > some of you have already discussed LANG-992. Do we need to push out an
> > immediate bugfix after we have resolved this?
>
> Perhaps.
>
> > Is this issue fixed in http://svn.apache.org/r1582585 ?
>
> Yes, AFAIK.
>
> > I'll have some time this weekend to create an RC.
>
> If so, IMO it should be 3.3.2 rather than 3.4.
>

Yes, usually I set the version to the next minor after doing a release.
That's why it has been set to 3.4-SNAPSHOT after 3.3.1


>
> There seems to be one new field:
>
> SystemUtils.IS_JAVA_1_8
>

my opinion is, that the clirr report for a patch release should be empty.
In this case Clirr will show one info, so following this convention is
would be 3.4. OTOH a minor release should introduce a few more features
beside a new field...


>
> which will need the appropriate @since marker
>

That's part of the documented release process and should be added by the
release manager (which will be me, if nobody else steps in :-)


>
> > Benedikt
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Reply via email to