Personally I'm on the fence on this subject, but I will reiterate that the point is moot in this context.
At this point I will attempt to steer this thread back on course by adding my own +1 to the release. Matt On Jun 5, 2014 12:44 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Age doesnt for sure, user number does. To be maybe clearer today main > [weaver] user is bval. Maybe we can check stats regarding downloads, nexus > can surely help. > Le 5 juin 2014 01:40, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > I agree with Sebb, age is irrelevant. BY still matters. > > > > Gary > > > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Emmanuel Bourg < > > ebo...@apache.org> </div><div>Date:06/04/2014 18:49 (GMT-05:00) > > </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > </div><div>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.1 based on > > RC1 </div><div> > > </div>Le 04/06/2014 23:58, sebb a écrit : > > > > > Huh? > > > Why should it matter how old the component is? > > > Breaking the API can still cause serious problems. > > > > If a young component isn't yet widely used a binary incompatible change > > is less likely to create a problem. It's not like [lang] or [io] which > > have been used everywhere for over a decade. > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
