On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 18/07/2014 16:13, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Would using "Headers" (plural) be better: withSkipHeadersRecord(boolean) > ? > > Isn't the plural form withSkipHeaderRecords() instead? > > But since there is only one header record I'd keep the singular form. > I guess it depends what you are counting and how ;-) There is indeed one header record. But that record contains one header per column, so one could conceivably says that there are one or more headers per record, just like there is one or more value per data record. It's a subtle change but it sounds like it did not help since you did not see it. Gary > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
