Okay, but we can agree upon "allow missing column names" instead of "ignore empty headers"?
I'll have some time to incorporate the suggestions of this thread and the other into trunk tomorrow evening. We'll see how that feels like. Benedikt Send from my mobile device > Am 20.07.2014 um 14:10 schrieb Gary Gregory <[email protected]>: > > "Is allowing property x" sounds awful to me. The following would be > acceptable: > > - is property x allowed > - is property x enabled > - is property x on/off > - is property - in some cases like isActive, isEnabled, is closed > > Gary > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Benedikt Ritter > <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:07/20/2014 04:06 (GMT-05:00) > </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > </div><div>Subject: Re: [CSV] Rename isIgnoreEmptyHeaders? (was: Re: [VOTE] > Release Commons CSV 1.0 based on RC1) </div><div> > </div>Any thoughts about this? I still think isAllowingEmptyColumnNames() is a > good name. :) > > Benedikt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
