I do not think we should change the maven coordinates if the package name does not change. Sebb, can you clarify?
Gary <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> </div><div>Date:08/22/2014 06:12 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [BCEL] Trying a release? </div><div> </div>On 2014-08-22, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Okay... TBH, I don't like that BCEL is treated special. Looks like a > different versioning schema to me. Also other groupId and artifactId. But > if you RM, it's your decision :-) I won't block a release because of this > if BCEL was always released like this. BCEL used to be a Jakarta Projects of its own rather than a Commons component, hence the historically different coordinates. If BCEL6 can be used as a drop in replacement, then not changing the coordinates might be a good idea (but begs the question of why it has a new major version). Gump says current BCEL trunk works for Xalan and Ant - at least to the extent their builds are using it. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
